Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Why You Should Use Infographics to Communicate Visually
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Hospitality Marketing: Going Mobile in the Digital Age
What makes a good mobile site? In a nutshell, it should automatically deliver a tailored experience. A few ways to accomplish this include:
- Resizing and compressing images and enlarging text
- Displaying contact information prominently
- Linking seamlessly to maps
- Not using outdated flash technology
- Using a mobile optimized booking engine
- Running mobile-only promotions to target on-the-go travelers with last-minute deals
- Not skimp on high-quality photos! Photos sell a hotel even before marketing copy, with nearly 73 percent of users clicking on photos of rooms after visiting the homepage.
- Keep things simple. As soon as a guest decides a site requires too much focus, effort, or time to find what they need, they will likely move on with without booking a room.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Hashtags: You’re Doing it Wrong
Friday, April 5, 2013
Four PR Trends

Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Public Relations is More Than Order Taking
Friday, October 26, 2012
Don’t Just Talk, Say Something
How many times have you stalled on a project because you really weren’t sure what was being asked of you?
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Lance Armstrong’s Race to Redefine His Legacy
By Julie Wright, President
How will you remember Lance Armstrong? As one of the most celebrated athletes in the world? As a cancer survivor who has inspired and helped millions of people around the world? Or as a fallen sports idol and fraud?
Say what you will about the doping case being built against him, but Armstrong’s Aug. 23 announcement that he would neither fight the charges nor arbitrate with the U.S. Anti Doping Agency (USADA) may just be the first time in his storied personal and professional life that he has ever given up on something.
He can beat cancer and win seven Tour de France titles, but he doesn’t have the will to contest these charges and fight to clear his name? At a net worth of $125 million, he certainly has the scratch to lawyer up and arbitrate or take it to court. But he doesn’t think he can win this case – either because it’s unwinnable, as he alleges, or because he is guilty, as the USADA alleges.
So, Armstrong is, instead, seeking to win the PR battle. If he can hang on to his reputation and convince fans to give him the benefit of the doubt, he will continue to have value as a product pitchman and cancer spokesman. By staying out of arbitration, he can continue to say that he has never tested positive, and, thus, the allegations will always be only allegations. In addition, Armstrong has been depositing a lot of credits in the goodwill account for many years through his Livestrong activities. This goodwill is a major asset during this crisis.
Ultimately, what do people want to believe? There is an emotional and rational component to this controversy. His innocence is a better story and outcome for sports fans and cancer sufferers than his guilt.
The USADA filed charges against him on June 12. On Aug. 23, Armstrong answered those charges by announcing he would stop fighting them. He was banned from the sport for life. His statement on the Livestrong website said “I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999. The toll this has taken on my family and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today -- finished with this nonsense.”
Had he persevered and fought the charges, a hearing may have been held in December with witnesses for and against.
This is a defining crisis for the Lance Armstrong brand and by not choosing his legal right to clear his name, he will forever be under a dark cloud of suspicion. But what can be learned from Armstrong’s public relations activities to counter this crisis and spare enough goodwill to maintain the credibility of his Livestrong efforts and his legacy to cancer if not to cycling?
First, bad news is bad news. You can choose to hide from it and let a bad situation define you or your brand. Or, you can step up and attempt to fill the vacuum with your own message. Armstrong chose the latter by announcing he wouldn’t fight the charges, unequivocally stating his innocence, casting doubt on the fairness of the process and reminding fans that he would rather spend his time supporting his foundation and the cause of cancer patients.
He also lined up a slew of communications and endorsements to reach fans with these messages. His Livestrong blog shared a message Aug. 23 from the Foundation’s founding chair Jeffery C. Garvey: “Faced with a biased process whose outcome seems predetermined, Lance chose to put his family and his foundation first and we support his decision. Lance’s legacy in the cancer community is unparalleled. Lance could have left cancer behind him and never looked back. Instead, before ever winning the Tour de France, he established a foundation that today has served 2.5 million cancer survivors with its free patient navigation services.”
The Lance Armstrong Foundation would clearly like to ensure his legacy is one of helping the cancer patient community.
Also lining up to throw their support behind Armstrong in this post were John R. Seffrin, PhD, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society and Matthew L. Myers, President, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
But Armstrong and his supporters are just getting started.
Attorney and former San Diego Chargers spokesman Mark Fabiani is representing Armstrong and getting the message out through the media now that the USADA has released its report. The details contained in the report might be exactly what Armstrong was hoping to keep out of the public eye by avoiding arbitration as the USADA-released report concludes that the U.S. Postal Service Team was engaged in a doping conspiracy that “was professionally designed to groom and pressure athletes to use dangerous drugs, to evade detection, to ensure its secrecy and ultimately gain an unfair competitive advantage through superior doping practices.”
On the same day that the USADA report came out, Oct. 10, Armstrong Tweeted “What am I doing tonight? Hanging with my family, unaffected, and thinking about this. http://bit.ly/Po6mXT #onward”.
The Tweet links to a press release issued by his foundation on that same day announcing its 15-year anniversary celebrations in Austin from Oct. 18-21. The highlight is the Fri., Oct. 19 fundraising gala that includes Norah Jones, Stephen Marley, Sean Penn, Ben Stiller, Robin Williams and, of course, Armstrong himself. With throngs of supporters at rallies, sporting events and the gala later this week, it might be difficult for people to see Armstrong as a bad guy.
By hammering on the work for cancer and success his foundation has achieved, the public might ask whether Armstrong hasn’t done more good for people in serious trouble than he has done harm to a sport and its competitors and fans?
Clearly that is the drumbeat to which Armstrong and his closest supporters are marching.
In a survey of more than 800 people that was conducted before the USADA’s findings were publicized, it would appear that the public was reluctant to turn on Armstrong. Sixty-seven percent said they still saw him in a positive light including 29 percent who said they were disappointed but respected what he has accomplished and 24 percent who believed Armstrong that he had never doped. Fourteen percent said he is still a champion while 8 percent said he is a cheater.
It will be interesting to see what the weekend’s celebrations produce to counter the negative coverage since Oct. 10, but with serious allegations about Armstrong that go beyond doping to bullying team members, paying $1 million to an Italian physician also accused of helping athletes dope and gifting $100,000 to the International Cycling Union and a drug-testing laboratory, fighting this crisis may be the one challenge his will alone won’t be enough to surmount.
Image credit: John Kershner / 123RF Stock Photo
Monday, July 23, 2012
How to Get the Most Out of Your Internship
Monday, April 23, 2012
Bad Cover Letters Need Not Apply
Our team here at (W)right On sees many cover letters, from
the flawless and well-organized to the ambiguous and typo-riddled. Superior
writing is the bread and butter of the communications industry, which is why an
exceptional cover letter is key to landing an interview. Here are some general
tips for crafting a compelling cover letter.Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Communications Tips from the Team

By Kristina Houck, Research and Online Content Specialist
Whether you are an intern starting out at an agency or a seasoned PR pro, you should always keep learning to better your craft.
In (W)right On’s latest newsletter, each of our team members provided a tip to share with others in the communications industry. Read these helpful tips from our team and share your favorite tips below.
1. Keep it Simple
"As communicators, we need to break through the clutter to be heard. Keep your message simple and direct if you want it understood."
-Julie Wright, President & Founder
2. Communication is Key
"Good communication is much more than meets the eye. Like law, medicine, fire fighting and sky diving, it's not something we should wing and hope for the best."
-Grant Wright, CEO & Managing Partner
3. Know Your Audience
"Getting a story covered by media is often the result of months of relationship building. Knowing what topics a writer doesn't cover is just as important as knowing what they do cover."
-Rebecca Chappell, Account Executive
4. Update Your Media Lists
"Newsrooms and editorial teams are constantly changing. Refresh your media lists often so they reflect the most current contacts."
-Chancelor Shay, Account Executive
5. Follow Up
"Most reporters receive hundreds of emails every day. After you send an initial email, make sure to follow up with your contacts by phone to ensure your pitch is heard."
-Maureen Legg, Account Executive
6. Proof Your Work
"For accuracy of written materials, make sure at least two people proof your work before it is sent to clients or the media."
- Elyse Charlesworth, Account Coordinator
Monday, May 10, 2010
Are your employee communications as productive as your employees?
in the employed rather than the unemployed category, they’ve stepped up, done more with less, and the statistics show it. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, productivity has increased more in the last year than it has in the last 48 years. Read that again: the productivity of American workers has increased so dramatically over the last 12 months that 1962 was the last time the workforce saw such an increase. Specifically, from the first quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2010, productivity increased 6.3 percent.Can this rate continue? Or is this a cause-effect relationship that will be a mere blip on the radar a year from now? Is your business prepared to make this a long-term trend? Businesses today don’t need sprinters, they need marathoners. It is foolish for employers to do nothing and expect that this trend will continue. It is more important than ever to have a strategic employee communications program in place. Whether your company consists of 5 or 50,000 – employees must feel connected, engaged.
If they are not already, have your corporate communications team work closely with human resources. Make sure employees are getting the need to know information as well as the nice to know.
At (W)right On, we’re leading internal communications programs for small businesses as well as for large, international businesses with tens of thousands of employees in hundreds of locations spread across the world. Don’t let language barriers, multiple time zones or diverse cultures be excuses. If you’re a small business, don’t just assume employees feel connected. Make the effort to communicate, it builds employee morale which will help keep productivity on the upswing.
Paraphrasing our favorite character from "The Office," Dwight Schrute. "Would I ever leave this company? Look, I’m all about loyalty. In fact, I feel like part of what I’m being paid for here is my loyalty. But if there were somewhere else that valued loyalty more highly, I’m going wherever they value loyalty the most."
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Five tips for a great agency relationship in 2010

Please feel free to contribute your suggestions. And it goes both ways. Resolutions for agencies are welcome too!
1. Communicate
If you expect a busy quarter ahead or will be consumed with a project, let your agency partners know. Please don't go dark for weeks and even months at a time in the middle of projects. And avoid following such periods of silence with firedrills where everything is now needed all at once. Your agency prides itself on being responsive and making the impossible happen for you, but it can be done better and for less money with a little planning and communication. That's how everybody wins!
2. Don't box people in
Boxes are made for moving and jewelry (though I like the latter best). Neither is meant for people. The more you box in a person or team, the less you get from them. Stay open to ideas. Containing people contains results. 'Nuff said.
3. Help us help you
Think of your agency as an extension of your team. The same way you would tell internal employees of a new venture, product or hire, tell the agency. Even if it's just a quick FYI email or a simple cc or bcc. It will help the agency better understand and manage your communications needs and reach your goals. It will also save you time (a.k.a budget) down the road.Designate a primary contact for your agency representative but be sure that individual is given at least some responsibility for decision making and accountability for agency communications and the PR program. If the designated contact is not made accountable or is not qualified to be so, we guarantee that items 1 through 3 above are not happening either.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Rule #1: Know Your Audience
Whatever you're communicating, you need to make the content relevant and interesting to your audience, first and foremost.
After attending an awards event last evening, I believe that this rule needs further clarification: you must also respect your audience.
It is only in the rarest of circumstances that an audience will wish you spoke longer. Therefore, be concise and to the point. Short speeches, I guarantee you, will be remembered as more entertaining than long ones no matter who you are. Even professional entertainers know this: "Leave them wanting more."
When you speak without notes, without preparation and to entertain and amuse yourself, you are not respecting your audience.
So, know who you're addressing, make the effort to connect with your audience, and show them respect by preparing and keeping it tight.
And, one last word on this subject, at risk of stating the obvious: remarks by outgoing presidents should be shorter than the remarks of the incoming president, and similarly, remarks introducing an award winner should be shorter than acceptance speeches. When these natural laws of speaking are inverted, audiences revolt.
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Internet's Dark Secret: It's Made of People!
Like 'Soylent Green,' the mysteries of the Internet are easy to unravel when you realize this: It's people. The Internet is made out of people.
Twitter, Facebook, search engines, websites, video, monitoring software...
The point of all of these tools is to help people connect and communicate. You've got to fulfill the expectations of the people on the other ends of these tools for them to work for you.
So don't be overwhelmed, intimidated or turned off by the technology. And conversely, don't make it all about the technology. Make it about the people. (Just don't actually turn the people into food. That's not supposed to happen until 2022, the year in which the film, Soylent Green, is set.)
But do add Soylent Green to your Netflix queue, and while you're at it, add SNL's the Best of Phil Hartman, who could impersonate Charleton Heston like no other before or since.
Monday, June 1, 2009
Communicate at a Glance

The Internet has changed our reading habits.
If you're like most people, you don't read online as much as you scan. And in all fairness, with so much information available to you, who can blame you?! Reading a website word-for-word makes about as much sense as admiring a field flower-by-flower or a grove tree-by-tree.
As communicators, we recognize these behaviors and preferences and leverage them for better results.
I've been talking about 'at a glance' communication for the last two years, by which I mean information that communicates the message with one look. Headings, subheadings, short bulleted lists, diagrams, images and captions all help to achieve this outcome.
Paragraphs of full prose kill this effect.
With attention in short supply, smart communicators are turning to visuals to engage their audiences. Economy of words and efficiency are essential to getting your point across.
However, there is a time and a place to use a lot of information: when you are trying to show 'at a glance' that you're the experts or the best source for something. In that case, employ the opposite tact and overload your communications with links, words, inserts, papers, slides -- no one may read any of them but, 'at a glance,' they'll get the message that you've got a lot to say or show, which must mean you've got a lot to offer.
Monday, May 25, 2009
Sea Change in Communications
Where I see a problem at this juncture is the disconnect between communicators and those that they counsel.
Too many clients and prospects remain anchored to the communication practices of the past and are unable to see or accept what's coming at them on the horizon. What's worse, they disregard the advice of the people who watch that horizon for a living! Yes, this lends itself to a macabre business analogy wherein we fail to recognize the peril we're in until it's right on top of us.
The five primary objections are that (1) social networks are time wasters, (2) social media is too time consuming, (3) these tools are only for teens and twenty-somethings, (4) they are fringe communications activities and are not useful for reaching customers, media or influencers, or (5) they are filled with irrelevant drivel.
All are dead wrong.
If you're a decision-maker with an organization who's realizing a little late that it's time to act, my best advice is that you hire someone who knows what you don't--a communications team with a range of personnel who has invested in understanding these tools, developing best practices and formulating policies that account for a Web 2.0 world.
Take decisive action and get to the social media high ground swiftly; avoid wallowing around trying to find your own way; and recognize that the cost of waiting or going it alone will far outweigh the cost of getting it done right and quickly.
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Social Media and B2B Marketing
I shared some examples of effective B2B social media communications with a technical focus. You can get a sense of the content of the presentation from the slides below.
I did steer the audience toward FriendFeed as a more technically oriented social networking tool. It may have a smaller number of users but when your target audience is limited to the 275 engineers that truly understand your area of electrical design, that's all you need--it's not about attracting thousands of followers, just those who matter.
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Hitting Pause in a Fast-Forward World

As communicators -- PR people, marketers, media, bloggers -- we're inundated with incoming and outgoing messages. Keeping pace is hard enough, but it's also not enough. We must stay ahead of the curve.
In this day and age, that's what our clients, readers, and viewers expect of us. We live in a hyper-connected world and are navigating it at hyperspeed.
Is it any wonder that from time to time, a communication goes awry or a message astray? In this communications environment, the unglamorous 'check and balance' has been run roughshod by the fast and the furious.
It reminds me of the character Toby, in my favorite TV show, The Office (yes, I'm finally making the connection to the photo above!). He's always trying to put the brakes on his boss Michael's ill-conceived ideas. But the office group-think and Michael's impatience always trump Toby's protestations, and Toby is the office buzzkill. It's good comedy, but it's a reminder that what's popular or fun is not always right or appropriate.
But, back to the real world and what happens when the checks and balances aren't adhered to: The New York Times had to post a retraction yesterday for running a letter to the editor that was supposedly from the mayor of Paris. It was critical of Caroline Kennedy and her senate seat run. New York Times letters are supposed to be verified with the author before being published. This one was edited and emailed back to its sender; however, it was published eventhough the sender -- who, of course, was not the mayor of Paris -- never responded to the Times.
This reminds me also of the French-Canadian DJs posing as French President Nicolas Sarkozy who got past the checks and balances that should have been protecting U.S. vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin from such embarassment.
And, I'm wondering, to borrow a phrase from the French, if "c'est la vie?" I hope not. And as communicators, I think it's imperative that we keep one finger on the pause button, ready to push. Communication is often defined by what you don't say, and keeping quiet can often be the best course (see our blog post from yesterday for more on that topic.)
This season, The Office brought Toby back from Costa Rica. I'll take this as a sign that we're ready to slow the pace down, increase our control over communications, heed and head off problems before they get bail-out big, and live with making unpopular decisions rather than living with disastrous consequences.








